February 2008
S M T W T F S
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29  

Categories

dallasnews.com
Sports Blogs

An exciting new blog feature

11:15 AM Thu, Oct 05, 2006 |
  E-mail   News tips

From this day on, we will be selecting a Blog Post of the Day Award.

Our esteemed panel will include our two regular moderators and the author and founder of this blog.

And remember the secret to having your comments posted: A limited amount of expletives and very positive comments regarding me.

m



Comments

Posted by Robert @ 12:20 PM Thu, Oct 05, 2006

Speaking of morons on ESPN....

Pasquerelli does an article on ESPN.com about a trend to rookie starting safeties and mentions everyone except the rookie leading his team in tackles, Pat Watkins. He even mentioned Rookies not starting.

Do you guys do ANY homework b/f you write anything?



Posted by Draegerman @ 12:25 PM Thu, Oct 05, 2006

It should also be mentioned that harsh critical comments directed towards our very own Tim Cowlishaw will also merit the poster Blog Post of the Day consideration.

Draegerman (POD candidate)



Posted by Texantt @ 12:41 PM Thu, Oct 05, 2006

You guys will do anything to get us to post more comments. Well, we want to be back on the FRONT page. I make comments based on what other scrubs like me say...not what the great Matt Mosley says. I can't see what my fellow fans are saying without clicking now. It's sux! (not officially a bad word because it's mis-spelled.)



Posted by tommy b @ 12:44 PM Thu, Oct 05, 2006

Matt, you are the greatest. You are worth more than three sports writers put together!

I was wondering why the media seemed to be calling this the T.O. circus? Why isn’t this the B.E.P.M.circus (Bad Eagle’s Personal Management circus)? Seriously, Terrell Owens athleticism has made quarterbacks look better and made whole teams better. So why didn’t the Eagles take better care of their star player? It is not like they were getting a drug addict, or an alcoholic, or a wife killer. No, they knew they were getting a type A personality who has a huge scare over his heart. And so, instead of working with T.O. they let him show his wounds to all and then pointed their bony little fingers at him to ostracize him. You may tell me that the Eagles tried several things, but let me say if an organization has millions of dollars then they have the capacity to know that employee turn over is an organizational killer. The Super Bowl cannot be had by any organization who is not willing to work through the issues of their star players have—whatever those issues are. The Cowboys have showed themselves very successful at working with and through issues of their star players. I think this is the protocol for success. Now the Cowboys are perfect in this, but they have taken care of business as well or better than other winning organizations. What are your thoughts?



Posted by Cindy Mac @ 1:56 PM Thu, Oct 05, 2006

Matt, for a skinny, pasty white boy, you're not bad looking. But, really, you couldn't have posted a better picture of yourself?

How's that?



Posted by Greg @ 2:15 PM Thu, Oct 05, 2006

And what, pray tell, will the winner of this esteemed and august prize receive?

A t-shirt saying "fancy little football person" maybe?



Posted by Dwayne @ 3:39 PM Thu, Oct 05, 2006

Here's an exciting new blog feature...put the comments back on the front page!



Posted by Rusty @ 7:17 AM Sat, Oct 07, 2006

To a "Fancy little football writer" Amid all the "Hoopla" it seems as though one thing that has been left unsaid. "T.O." knows the Philadelphia playbook, their coaches, their players, and their tendencies. Don't you think this should give us a distinct advantage? Cowboys 27-14



Leave comment

Comments limited to 30 words or less are preferred. All comments may be edited for language and/or grammar.




Please enter the security code below - this helps us avoid spam.

  

E-mail entry:

Message (optional):
Send to e-mail address:
Your e-mail address:
 

Dallas Cowboys/
NFL on the Web