February 2008
S M T W T F S
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29  

Categories

dallasnews.com
Sports Blogs

Giants Rush Analysis

12:29 PM Tue, Jan 08, 2008 |
Albert Breer   E-mail   News tips

Here’s how the Giants attacked Jeff Garcia on his 40 pass drops:

3-man pressure: 3 of 40 snaps (1 first half/2 second half)
4-man pressure: 28 of 40 snaps (16/12)
5-man pressure: 4 of 40 snaps (3/1)
6-man pressure: 5 of 40 snaps (1/4)

GARCIA NUMBERS
First Half

Vs. 3-man pressure: 1-1, 4 yards
Vs. 4-man pressure: 8-15, 62 yards; Sack
Vs. 5-man pressure: 1-3, 8 yards
Vs. 6-man pressure: 1-1, 4 yards
Second Half
Vs. 3-man pressure: 1-2, 8 yards
Vs. 4-man pressure: 8-12, 92 yards, TD, INT
Vs. 5-man pressure: 1-1, 15 yards
Vs. 6-man pressure: 2-4, 13 yards, INT
Overall
Vs. 3-man pressure: 2-3, 12 yards
Vs. 4-man pressure: 16-27, 154 yards, TD, INT; Sack
Vs. 5-man pressure: 3-4, 22 yards
Vs. 6-man pressure: 3-5, 17 yards, INT

WHAT IT MEANT: The Giants forced Garcia to get rid of the ball quickly, no matter what kind of pressure they brought. The QB averaged an anemic 5.31 yards per attempt, and that number dropped to 3.4 yards when New York brought six. The Giants prompted the fast release and checkdowns also through deception, overloading a side and dropping a lineman on the opposite end, while rotating the coverage over. Just a masterful job of keeping an efficient passing attack in check by Steve Spagnuolo, whose Jim Johnson roots are showing. The rush didn’t always get there. But the threat was omnipresent, and that’s the idea.



Leave comment

Comments limited to 30 words or less are preferred. All comments may be edited for language and/or grammar.




Please enter the security code below - this helps us avoid spam.

  

E-mail entry:

Message (optional):
Send to e-mail address:
Your e-mail address:
 

Dallas Cowboys/
NFL on the Web