February 2008
S M T W T F S
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29  

Categories

dallasnews.com
Sports Blogs

Giants Rush Analysis

2:44 PM Tue, Jan 15, 2008 |
Albert Breer   E-mail   News tips

How the Giants came after Tony Romo on his 40 pass drops:

3-man pressure: 2 of 40 snaps (2 first half/0 second half)
4-man pressure: 25 of 40 snaps (7/18)
5-man pressure: 4 of 40 snaps (1/3)
6-man pressure: 5 of 40 snaps (4/1)
7-man pressure: 3 of 40 snaps (1/2)
8-man pressure: 1 of 40 snaps (0/1)

ROMO NUMBERS
First Half

Vs. 3-man pressure: 1-2, 11 yards
Vs. 4-man pressure: 4-6, 42 yards; 1 rush, 7 yards
Vs. 5-man pressure: 1-1, 13 yards
Vs. 6-man pressure: 2-4, 16 yards, TD
Vs. 7-man pressure: 0-1
Vs. 8-man pressure: 0-0
Second Half
Vs. 3-man pressure: 0-0
Vs. 4-man pressure: 6-16, 71 yards, INT; Sack; 1 rush, 11 yards
Vs. 5-man pressure: 3-3, 32 yards
Vs. 6-man pressure: 0-1
Vs. 7-man pressure: 1-2, 16 yards
Vs. 8-man pressure: 0-0; Sack
Overall
Vs. 3-man pressure: 1-2, 11 yards
Vs. 4-man pressure: 10-22, 113 yards, INT; Sack; 2 rush, 18 yards
Vs. 5-man pressure: 4-4, 45 yards
Vs. 6-man pressure: 2-5, 16 yards, TD
Vs. 7-man pressure: 1-3, 16 yards
Vs. 8-man pressure: 0-0; Sack

WHAT IT MEANT: For one thing, the lackluster numbers against standard, four-man pressure meant that the Giants covered well in those situations. The sack was a result of coverage, and in plenty of other cases, the coverage was good enough to get the linemen into Romo’s face, with a collapsing pocket. And after Romo showed an aptitude for dealing with the Giants’ five-man pressure, Steve Spagnuolo seemed to approach a bit of all-or-nothing approach, sending either four or the house and crowding the line at times to disguise it.



Comments

Posted by Mig @ 2:57 PM Tue, Jan 15, 2008

I guess this numbers defeat the perception about the Giants throwing the kitchen ast Romo in the 2nd half is wrong. They onl blitzed 7 out of 25 times.

The evidence is clear that the Boys failed against the 4 man rush in the second half (6 for 16).

The perception of all the blitzing was aided by the fact that the O-line stunk in the final 25 minutes of the game (after the 3rd Q FG).



Posted by DatMel @ 2:58 PM Tue, Jan 15, 2008

Wow. As a Giants fan I pretty much only came on here to insult the Cowboys and their fans but in the process I have to say I have gained the world of respect for the writers of this Blog. You guys are first class and do a really great job. Kudos.



Posted by Jacob Rogers; Shane Hannah; Phil Pozderic @ 3:13 PM Tue, Jan 15, 2008

we can't believe how crappy the O-Line played when it mattered most...get in shape guys!!!...



Leave comment

Comments limited to 30 words or less are preferred. All comments may be edited for language and/or grammar.




Please enter the security code below - this helps us avoid spam.

  

E-mail entry:

Message (optional):
Send to e-mail address:
Your e-mail address:
 

Dallas Cowboys/
NFL on the Web